Outsourced Services: Now might be the time to have a constructive talk with your IT service provider

IT Service Provider
For a manufacturer, selecting the right IT service provider is an important decision. As the business starts to rely on emerging technologies to exploit new business opportunities, it is important that the IT partner simultaneously invests in understanding these technologies and developing a strategy to introduce these to clients, while managing the risk.

How is your IT outsourced services provider performing? The Gartner hype cycle provides a simple graphic representation of how emerging technologies are adopted in the market. The principle is quite simple: a new technology (such as augmented reality) will start moving up the hype cycle curve as a result of an innovation trigger. Early development is characterised by increasing expectations as a result of publicity and market curiosity. As the hype increases the new technology reaches a ‘peak of inflated expectations’, after which reality sets in and it rapidly plunges into a ‘trough of disillusionment’. The descent accelerates as early interest wanes and implementations fail. Along the way, many of these new technologies simply disappear. Those that survive mature and move up the ‘slope of enlightenment’ as more and more implementations succeed. At this point, the technology is proven and gains general acceptance. It is considered to have reached the ‘plateau of productivity’.

There are risks associated with early adoption

Manufacturing IT, particularly that associated with Industry 4.0, is a combination of several emerging technologies each at different stages of maturity along the hype-cycle curve. Some of these (like blockchain, deep neural networks etc.) are still over-hyped, while others, like IIoT platforms, are dropping into the trough as reality sets in.

There is a very real risk to an industrial manufacturing organisation in moving too early on emerging technology. The risk needs to be managed well to avoid a costly mistake.

Only the largest manufacturing organisations have the in-house capabilities to manage this proliferation of emerging technologies. Many do not. Most outsource their information technology initiatives to IT service providers (ITSPs). The belief is that the ITSP will remain on top of things, but is this always the case?

Outsourced services does not solve everything

Outsourcing to an IT service provider might seem like the best approach to gain access to additional capabilities for Industry 4.0. In the past ITSPs used to say that outsourcing will ‘allow you to focus on your core business’. What then if the next generation manufacturing ‘core business’ is technology-driven?

Outsourcing does not necessarily mitigate against all the inherent risks, particularly as most emerging technologies will be new to the outsourced partner as well. Success will strongly depend on the capabilities of the strategic partner, the way it is organised and its ability to align, adapt and grow with industry trends.

IT service providers providing a total outsourced service are faced with the challenge of keeping current with emerging technologies in order to adequately serve their clients. But specialised skills are hard to find. ITSPs need to acquire, develop and retain these new skills while at the same time ensuring that their existing business runs profitably. Managing this complex mix of skills is in itself a specialised activity.

In practice, most IT service providers are a diverse mix of technical departments and profit-driven business units. To succeed as a strategic partner to the modern manufacturing industry, the IT service provider has to align its service offerings to meet the challenging requirements of Industry 4.0. Account managers that understand the manufacturing industry intimately are an essential ingredient to manage the many interfaces between the client and the internal ITSP organisation.

An Industry 4.0 strategy will often involve exploiting new business models. Some industrial manufacturers are shifting from large capital expenditure projects to smaller modular ‘pay as you go’ service models. Emerging technologies are often a necessary part of this transformation. IT service providers, therefore, need to realign their own offerings accordingly or face becoming irrelevant. What has worked in the past is not necessarily going to work in the future.

Finding the right balance is crucial

Finding the right balance of in-house versus outsourced IT is important in order to succeed in the world of Industry 4.0. The strategic IT partner will have to have excellent capabilities in cloud deployment, microservices, application lifecycle management, business systems, operational management systems and so on. A strategic IT partner will also be able to develop an intimate understanding of your business. Not all partners are up to this challenge.

For a manufacturer, selecting the right IT service provider is an important decision. As the business starts to rely on emerging technologies to exploit new business opportunities, it is important that the IT partner simultaneously invests in understanding these technologies and developing a strategy to introduce these to clients, while managing the risk. The consequences of not getting this balance right can be severe indeed. The process of selecting, managing and growing this strategic relationship will require exceptional leadership and mutual commitment to making it work.

This article was first published on SA Instrumentation and Control.

Disclaimer:
This article was developed with the support of generative AI tools, based on my ideas, direction and input. I review and edit all AI-assisted content to ensure it reflects my judgement, standards and intended message.

Share this:

Related Articles

Microsoft Build 2026, Frontier Firms and the AI Pricing Problem

Microsoft Build is once again focused on AI agents, Copilot and the emerging concept of the “Frontier Firm”. While the technology is impressive, two practical concerns remain: unpredictable AI pricing and Microsoft’s increasingly confusing Copilot branding. After a weekend experimenting with Codex and researching self-hosted AI alternatives, I’m convinced that affordability and clarity may prove just as important as model capability in determining how quickly businesses adopt agentic AI.

Read More
CIO explaining AI costs to Board

Are Your Teams Looking Beyond AI Hype to Real Outcomes?

AI investment is moving fast, but many enterprises are building fragile ecosystems underneath the hype. CIOs are now facing tougher questions around ROI, vendor lock-in, governance, and rising operational costs. This article explores how enterprise leaders can build a resilient AI strategy that survives changing market conditions by focusing on procurement discipline, modular architecture, measurable business outcomes, and strong governance. It outlines practical steps to reduce dependency risk, control hidden AI costs, and keep AI investments tied to real operational value rather than experimentation alone.

Read More
MongoDB options

MongoDB, Performance Constraints and the Case for Self Hosting

MongoDB helped apLabs get started, but the real lesson came later. Atlas Free Tier was a generous way to learn the platform and build iteratively, but as the project grew, performance on the hosted free tier became the bottleneck. Moving to self-hosted MongoDB Community Edition on a local Debian server solved the immediate constraint and kept the work moving without forcing an unnecessary upgrade.

Read More